Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Sunflower Update

I drove past the field today and they were gone. They have not looked very good for the last week. They had drooping heads and many looked seedless. There was a sign on the edge of the field identifying Natorps as the sunflower planter. They were nice when fresh but the field now looks better mowed.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Smile

Along Snider Road just north of Fields-Ertel there is something new this year. What in previous years had been just another soy bean field is planted in sunflowers.

I pass this field on my way to somewhere several times a week. For the past month the flowers have been in bloom. Every time I have passed the field, there has been someone standing at its edge looking at the field of sunflowers.

Most of the time people are also taking pictures of the sunflowers. People standing along Snider Road with a camera taking a picture of a field. I have also seen people on top of ladders taking photos from above, I have seen more than one couple just inside the first row kissing while having their picture taken, and entire families surrounded by sunflowers being photographed.

It makes me smile to see people made so happy by a field of sunflowers. I have seen sunflowers before but this is the first time have have witnessed such a fuss around the flowers.

Does anyone know why?

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Haircuts

I never know how to react right after my wife gets a hair cut. Nearly 25 years of marriage has taught me that haircuts are always a risky subject. Maybe it is too short, maybe the shape is wrong, maybe the color isn't what she really wanted. There are too many possible problems. However, if she loves the haircut and I don't say how good it looks then I get told I never notice anything.

At work the risks are just as high with the added risk of what is really appropriate for a male to be saying to a female co-worker. I wouldn't think an innocent comment like, 'that's a cute haircut' could be considered harassment but I am not 100% sure that I can ever comment on how someone else looks in the workplace.

So I behave like a chicken in both situations and act as if I hadn't noticed.

Yesterday after work I got my hair cut.

The only comments I received today were variations on the "you got a haircut" theme. No one said it was cute, or made me look slimmer or younger, so either others play the chicken game also or it is really a bad haircut!



Monday, July 6, 2009

Vacation

Any additional vacation ideas? (June 28).

How far ahead to you plan your vacation?

Does planning start as soon as the last vacation ends?

Are several little vacations (3 days or less) better than one big see it all vacation (7 days or more)?

When is your favorite time of year to take a vacation?

If you vacation in the winter do you go to a winter location or is a winter vacation used to go to warm location?

Do you save up for vacation, or put it on credit?

Sunday, July 5, 2009

July 4th Trivia

Many of the answers have been repeated in yesterday's news broadcasts about the 4th:

1). Name the president(s) who died on July 4, 1826, (50 years after 1776).

2). Name any other presidents who died on July 4th, any year.

3). Name the president(s) born on the 4th of July.

4). What early 20th Century song is about a composer born on the 4th of July?

5). Name the composer from question #4 above.

6). Name the only Chief Justice of the United States to die on July 4th.

7). Name the current presidential connection to July 4th.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Declaration of Independence

The Unanimous Declaration
of the Thirteen United States of America

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts: John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut: Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York: William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey: Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania: Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware: Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland: Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia: George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina: William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Source: The Pennsylvania Packet, July 8, 1776

(Copied from the following website)

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/doi/text.html

4th of July

Happy Independence Day!

Did you ever wonder why we have fireworks on the 4th of July?

Well, let me tell you about someone who predicted it happening ....

Back in 1776 there was a man named John Adams who was at an extended business meeting in Philadelphia. Mr. Adams had a habit of writing to his wife Abigail, who had not traveled with Mr. Adams to Philadelphia, but remained home in Massachusetts.

Mr. Adams was a person that had a few revolutionary ideas.

For some reason the Adams Family didn't feel the need to keep their private correspondence private, so the contents of his letter is known. (If alive today, I would think they would be very comfortable having a very public Facebook or My Space page).

In the letter written July 3rd, 1776 Mr. Adams states: "The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever more."

Adams' prediction was off by two days. From the outset, Americans celebrated Independence Day on July 4, the date the much-publicized Declaration of Independence was approved, rather than on July 2, the date the resolution of independence was approved in a closed session of Congress. (Thank you Wikipedia).